Moorabbin Crash Zone
How Safe is Safe?
At What Price?
Noise
Views of The Politicians
Keep Me Informed
A Residents Association
Facts & Data & Links
e-mail me

Bookmark and Share





 

Call The Noise Line 1800 802 584
Call The Airport And Speak To The CEO Mr Phil McConnell  (03) 95878000
Call The Minister, Mr Anthony Albanese (02) 62777680


 


THE COMMUNITY HAS HAD ENOUGH!

                                                                                                                                                                              I would like to join the chorus of people under the flight path of small planes from Moorabbin Airport in my opposition to the proposed increase the number of flights. These LOW-flying planes have unmuffled engines that rage over our residences are a physical hazard & are causing significant psychological strain (read:Stress related injury) They come particularly on a sunny weekend, building up in volume until you can only wait for them to pass to resume what you're doing. It takes about 60seconds for them to approach, fly over & disappear again, with the middle 20 seconds very loud. It's so unnecessary too. Surely in this day & age they can reduce (or be made to reduce) the noise with effective mufflers etc. How many people does it affect? How many times does it affect them? When is something going to be done? How many letters have to be written? This is my first to you but fourth overall. Does the community have to sue the Airport or the Govt for damages?

I have attached a letter from a pilot who lives in the area which I'm sure you've seen. He talks about the lack of progress in noise reduction in these old planes & that Training flights should go to non-residential areas. It's commonsense. Why expand the airport & aggravate an already pissed off neighbourhood?”

Jan 2010
Mentone Resident
                                                                                                                                                                      




COMMUNITY SUBMISSIONS TO THE 2010 SENATE ENQUIRY INTO AIRPORT NOISE



                                                                                                      

Submission By Moorabbin Airport Resident's Association 

SUMMARY:

The community who live, work and study around Moorabbin Airport has never had an effective complaint mechanism for reporting the noise that is generated by the airport.

Neither the Moorabbin Airport Corporation, ASA or CASA have seen it as their role to address the community’s issues regarding noise and its impact on the community. Not surprisingly then, there has never been community consultation, nor any effective management of aircraft noise.

We believe Airservices Australia has failed in its duty to conduct open and informed public consultation with the community affected by Moorabbin Airport aircraft noise.  We believe it has also failed in its duty in several of the Senate Inquiry’s other Terms of Reference, which we will address below. The result is a community which is frustrated, ignored, powerless and lacking faith in Govt. Aircraft Authorities -  no one listens, no one helps. 


Submission By Aspendale Resident 

Absence of Noise Data Collection and Transparency

AirServices Australia is not collecting or acting on aircraft noise data within the Moorabbin Control Zone which is one of the busiest aviation precincts in the country

Managing Noise at the Source

CASA will readily confirm that it has no involvement in aircraft noise as it relates to community amenity and yet it is involved with Air Navigation Regulations relating to noisy aircraft.   Meanwhile AirServices Australia endorses long range noise forecasts prepared by the private business Moorabbin Airport Corporation (MAC) which impact on local Council planning and yet AirServices Australia admits that it has no idea where the MAC data comes from.  It's a management shambles.

Who Puts The Measurements Into Context & How?

Aviation noise management requires context, using a similar approach to that applied by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA).  Currently there is no attempt to measure & manage aircraft noise by first considering the perspective and requirements of sensitive urban areas which are particularly affected by aviation activity.  So while there is little consideration of human ecology and reduced quality of life, believe it or not there are actually documented aircraft procedures relating to noise abatement for breeding sea birds, whales and national parks!

Measurements Alone Don’t Solve The Problems

Even if AirServices had the right data it doesn’t appear to know what to do with it.

Irrational Aviation Procedures Underpin Much Of The Noise Issue

In many cases a simple rethink of common procedures would greatly reduce noise pollution from aviation.  Circuit and entry altitudes within the Moorabbin Control Zone, particularly for helicopters are a case in point.

The Problem Is Much Bigger Than Any One Department

There are conflicting interests and fragmented poorly communicating departments within Aviation and AirServices is just one of the many stake holders.  The AirServices Webtrak system is nothing more than an expensive and fairly meaningless PR exercise and doesnt provide the community with proper information about aircraft activity or identifcation..

There Are Solutions, but Who Is Listening?

Is there really a desire to see effectiveness in the management of aircraft noise and if so why is the enquiry limited to AirServices Australia?  It appears that no department has the authority or enthusiasm to become involved with even the most obvious issues and solutions.
                                                                                                  

TO SEE ALL OF THE SENATE SUBMISSIONS CLICK HERE

Bookmark and Share